One of the most complicated struggles, as I have previously
discussed, is the integration of creativity, relatability, and accessibility
into more technical writing.
Professional writing seems to require a stricter consideration and
communication than informal writing.
However, the most effective pieces of writing, regardless of genre, are
those that engage the reader. Depending
on the work, this could mean shifting opinion, guiding through new information,
or just stimulating thought, conclusion, or response. I would argue that it is much more effective
to reach out by integrating creative ideas, examples, even humor. It can be so easy to become lost in the facts
and figures, somewhere I find myself often.
I am concerned as to how much this relates to the particular
division or work environment of a field.
Integrating relatable humor into a new technology review for an informal
media publication company is one thing.
A technical report regarding doctoral research filings is another matter
entirely. I fail to see, however, why it
should be. If the information is of
value, I believe it should be presented in a manner that is accessible to the
vast majority of the population. How can
something be revolutionary if only the most educated and dedicated individuals
can stomach the bombardment of jargon?
How can big ideas be grown, adapted, and realized if the large groups of
dedicated people cannot be moved to action by complex propositions?
From my perspective, there seems to be a fundamental
disconnect between the research community and the dreaming makers. I have read dozen-page research articles from groups of individuals with grant funding on ideas that can and should be
changing the world. I have read
dozen-page guides and walkthroughs of projects and amateur led from concept to
fruition with dedication and care. I
honestly cannot confirm which group is more brilliant. Both groups have big ideas and ridiculous grammar
mistakes. Both groups are incredibly
passionate but lack the resources, in terms of people or funding, to realize
the fullest extent of their goals. Both have
dedicated themselves to pursuits that no single individual can or should fully
conquer alone.
We need to meet. We
need to talk. We need to build a better
world together. To do that, we must
compose our thoughts and ideas in a manner that is accessible to everyone.